Ideally, trade in its complexity often comes with sets of legal requirements which stand as proof of binding contract, this originates from freight forwarders to the consignees based on a specific quote, thus, trade terms. The subject phrase which meant requirement over service delivery per trade is stipulated conditions curbed out by freight companies, significantly for the purpose of legal interest regarding their business in accordance with the global shipping policy.
These sets of conditions required per trade differ based on category and service delivery owing to the fact that cross-border trade comes in diverse categories. However, what’s important is the area of service delivery that’s required by individual consignees such as freight handling, logistics operation, contract of carriage, documentation, and freight receive as agent per trade. The subject sets of requirements and conditions mapped out per trade deal are favorable conditions that ensure that an understanding has been established by concerned parties while noting that cross-border trade will require legal backing.
In fact, terms are undoubtedly core to trade, and this is because if there isn’t established understanding over a trade, then there is no trade deal.
It should be borne in mind that the success of a company’s trade goal that includes individual competence, be it expertise in this field of the global supply chain is dependent on terms of specific trade, however, in view of this, the subject topic should be considered a priority. Since this is vital in all vectors and domains of trade, given this a professional touch wouldn’t be much to ask.
Going forward, looking at trade from the angle of our discussion, it will be fair to note that legal requirements and filings over a particular trade are backed by terms and conditions of trade, hence, should there arise a bridge of contract over established understanding! Reference or filing will be made based on agreed terms of a particular trade. However, to ensure this submission isn’t half-baked, it will be fair to put this nicely down from the point of practical scenarios.
Let’s say, for instance, a shipper or freight forwarder was contracted to ship specific goods from Texas in the U.S. to Germany or Texas to Nigeria, or vas versa based on agreed terms that cut across protection of the subject goods, which entail insurance regarding loss or damage on transit. Noting that the subject freight is to be loaded on-board a vessel as seaborne trade, however, due to gust wind as she transit from the port of origin to the port of final destination, nature took its course, and the shipment eventually got lost or damaged.
Now, based on terms of trade that ensured there’s insurance in place, if the shipper or the shipping company contracted as a third party for the carriage of the subject goods declines from taking responsibility for any catastrophic outcome, should the consignee file for claims, his lawyer is expected to file a lawsuit based on trade terms as valid provision for the subject trade, otherwise, in the absence of these terms, the consignee may bear the loss.
For instance, when a merchant forwards goods based on received order from a consignee to be transported by any mode of transport or carriage, either by a third party, in practice, terms are professionally structured in this format – “RECEIVED FOR SHIPMENT from a MERCHANT as forwarded in apparent good order and condition unless otherwise stated on the shipment Bill of Lading, the actual Goods mentioned to be transported as provided on the document, by any or specific mode of transport or carriage, is SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS appearing on the subject shipment document should equally appear on the CARRIER’S applicable tariff.”
In a broader dimension, the subject terms curbed out by the shipper of the said goods serve as a preventive tool used to ensure that each consignee strictly adheres to lay down terms of trade while safeguarding the company’s interest. But primarily, these terms are deployed by shippers or freight forwarders for the essence of safe and profitable business coupled with accurate delivery conditions to the owner of goods to its agent at the port of final destination. For instance, goods should be released to the consignee after tariff has been paid or at the presentation of a specific shipment bill of lading endorsed by us (the shipper). Such a trade tool also serves as deterrence against illegal filing by consignee’s claims that appear contrary to agreed terms.
Equally, it’s also significant to view this subject from the angle of carriage which should be shaped accordingly, thus, ideally shaped in practice through a shipper to its agent with these terms – “applicable law requires that a copy of BILL of Lading must be surrendered, duly endorsed, in exchange for the GOODS or CONTAINER(S) or other PACKAGES(S), but if a ‘Non-Negotiable’ Bill of Lading is issued, the others will stand void.
- Kindly leave your opinion below if you found this submit helpful!
Be the first to comment